reassign 221982 lintian thanks At Wed, 5 May 2004 10:30:03 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > There is nothing wrong with the file naming. There is also no point to > having a SONAME, because we do not ship a .so symbolic link; the linker > will do the right thing. > > If you think that any change is low risk you've obviously never worked > with glibc :) I also think lintian should just ignore the NSS > libraries, one way or another. They are shared libraries meant to be > accessed by dlopen. They have to live in $libdir because that's where > everything will look for them.
Fully agreed. I think there's no reason to assign this bug to glibc. For three agreement, I reassign it to lintian back. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]