Hi Matthias, At Sat, 3 Apr 2004 08:23:44 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > This patch applied upstream > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-12/msg00025.html > is supposed to fix about 900 test failures in the libjava testsuite in > gcc-3.4. Note that I didn't test the patch myself. > > Matthias > > Compare the Debian test results > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-03/msg00816.html > > === libjava Summary === > > # of expected passes 1487 > # of unexpected failures 900 > # of expected failures 4 > # of untested testcases 908 > > with Ulrich's test results > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-04/msg00098.html > > === libjava Summary === > > # of expected passes 3259 > # of unexpected failures 2 > # of expected failures 11 > # of untested testcases 8
OK, I successfully built libc6 on raptor.debian.org with this s390 backtrace patch. The build was stopped on the way because raptor unstable lacks various packages to build libc6 completely. I put such libc6 binaries at ~gotom/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13/glibc-2.3.2.ds1 on raptor. Can you easily test it on raptor? If not, please test gcc testsuite after duploading glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
