[Cc to BTS] At Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:58:07 +0800, $(0-nKgTJ(B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Your 'From:' field uses raw BIG5? Using MIME encode is better...
> > Why is this bug assigned for libc6? Which version is libc6 ? > > libc6 is glibc. I have seen the same bug before when I was working > on Red Hat 7.3 for another server. I searched the google and found a > bug report at the Red Hat's bugzilla, on glibc: > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65612 > > I recently switched my own servers from Red Hat to Debian (due to > the Red Hat KDE Taiwan national flag event), and I found the same > problem. I was quickly reminded that this may be a bug of glibc in > Debian, too. This bug is solved as soon as I recompiled and installed > glibc myself. It's a little hard to do this, though. Thank you for pointing to me. It's glibc bug as you said. > Besides, I found this bug while I was compiling perl 5.8.0 and doing > "make test". perl's "make test" fails at t/op/int since it tests for (3 > % -10). I know few people checks the failure of "make test" seriously, > but I just happen to be the one. "make test" is only test, so I don't concern. Woody is already released, and this bug is not critical bug, so I'm afraid it's not fix for woody... I classify this bug as 'Tags: woody', and it's fixed if sarge will be released. > > BTW, this bug is appeared on woody (2.2.5-15), but > > not on sid (2.3.1-3). > > That's great. ^_*' But sid is still unstable, so I can't put it on > production servers. ^^; My own new glibc works perfectly now. ^_*' Well, currently sid (2.3.1-3) is still under development, Putting it on production system is adventure (^_^; Regards, -- gotom
