> > I still think that skiping a supported architecture, as well as the ground > > rule > > about syncing everything before allowing a package to slide down to > > testing, is > > a REALLY bad idea, especialy for something so fundamental as glibc. > > You are _so_ welcome to fix the problem. It's impractical to allow > one architecture to hold testing hostage for this long; I'm sure Carlos > and his heroic efforts would appreciate any help.
1 buglet left before release (tst-cancel2). Thanks for the moral support! :) c.
