On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:19, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:49:38AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > >> I also tested on both 2.4 and 2.6 kernel, even with removing > >> ~/.xmms. However I cannot reproduce it... Which CPU do you use? I use an AMD Athlon XP 2500+ on an Asus nforce2 board with nvidia drivers.
> > I also cannot reproduce 2.4 kernel on k7 using Debian's package, and > > Pentium 2 Xeon, using Debian's 2.6.0-test9 kernel package. > > The original bug report says "Unless libmikmod2 is installed [...]". > (xmms recommends libmikmod2.) > > If I move /usr/lib/libmikmod.so.2* out of the way I can reproduce > this problem with 2.6.0-test9-mm2: Yes, if I install libmikmod2 xmms starts up normally. > % xmms > libmikmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72: > _dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result <= _rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx' > failed! > > > I also can reproduce the problem mentioned above: > > % /lib/ld-2.3.2.so /lib/libc-2.3.2.so > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1259: dl_main: Assertion > `_rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_prev->l_next == > _rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_next' failed! % /lib/ld-2.3.2.so > /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so [...] > BTW, why aren't the executable bits set for libc-2.3.2.so in the > current glibc packages? This is new since the -ds libc packages I think. Until now I thought it is to hide the bug ;) thanks have fun Felix
