On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 05:53:17PM +0100, Christoph Martin wrote: > >>>>I am using Sophos for Linux which is linked against it's own library > >>>>in /usr/local/Sophos/lib apparently with -R. libc6 Version > >>>>2.3.2.ds1-10 would run the binary without a problem: > >>>> > >>>>ldd /usr/local/Sophos/bin/sweep > >>>> libsavi.so.3 => /usr/local/Sophos/lib/libsavi.so.3 (0x4001f000) > >>>> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4016f000) > >>>> libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x402a1000) > >>>> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) > >>>> > >>>>After updating to Version -11. libsavi.so.3 would not be found anymore: > >>>> > >>>>ldd /usr/local/Sophos/bin/sweep > >>>> libsavi.so.3 => not found > >>>> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4001c000) > >>>> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) > >>> > >>> > >>>Output of readelf -l bin/sweep, please? > >>> > > Thanks. Unfortunately, I have realized that I actually wanted "readelf > > -d" .... > > > > Dynamic segment at offset 0x20078 contains 22 entries: > Tag Type Name/Value > 0x00000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libsavi.so.3] > 0x00000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.6] > 0x0000000f (RPATH) Library rpath: [/usr/local/lib]
Well, that's your problem then. The RPATH says /usr/local/lib. Are you sure nothing else changed in your environment between these two runs - LD_LIBRARY_PATH, the binary itself, /etc/ld.so.conf? There's no way that a binary with only that RPATH will look in /usr/local/Sophos/lib. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
