GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
>> Reading unix(7), I understand that <sys/un.h> should define UNIX_PATH_MAX, >> and in fact it does not. >> >> Is this intentional ? > > I don't know this is intentional or not, but there is no rule that we > need to define UNIX_PATH_MAX. In addition POSIX does not define its > path size (typically it's between 92 and 108, and linux is 108). If > you want to look UNIX_PATH_MAX like unix(7), see > /usr/include/linux/un.h . I haven't looked at other unices, but if the define is mentionned in the manpage, I guess it's for a reason. Portability comes to mind :) > I would like to close, OK? Either one of libc or the manpage needs to be fixed, I'll let you decide which one needs fixing. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | <http://www.debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169