On 2004.04.20 17:36, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Sun, 18 Apr 2004 10:54:34 +0100 (BST), > J.D. Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I reread this thread, and I think: > > > > > > (1) glibc should not depend on initscripts > > > (2) glibc should not install three files (defalt/tmpfs, > > > default/devpts, init.t/mountkernfs) > > > (3) new initscripts should handle removing mountkernfs, devpts.sh > > > > OK with me. (There's more than one way to skin a cat.) > > Thanks for reviewing. > > ...And Miquel, could you reply whether it's ok or not? We plan to > dupload glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12 with removing mountkernfs/devpts.sh very > soon.
Sure, I've made the nessecary changes, and -16 is ready for upload: sysvinit (2.85-16) unstable; urgency=high * Remove /etc/init.d/{mountkernfs,devpts.sh) that glibc installed since mountvirtfs now provides these. (closes: #230857) * Remove -e from mountvirtfs (closes: #232122) * Add some more comments/documentation to mountvirtfs * Initscripts depends on libc6 anyway right now, so we let it depend on libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-12) via shlibs.local * Suggest sysv-rc-conf (closes: #244643) * Updated french manpage for update-rc.d (closes: #245007) * Use larger dmesg buffer (-s option) (closes: #242923) -- Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:11:17 +0200 I'm just waiting for 2.3.2.ds1-12 to hit the archive before I upload the new sysvinit, so I don't upload a package whose dependencies cannot be satisfied. Mike.