At Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:24:30 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > I did indeed have a copy of libdl.so in /usr/lib:
> > > pwd
> > /fs/mama/usr/lib
> > > ls -l libdl*
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10752 Jan 20 09:29 libdl.a
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Jan 23 11:08 libdl.so ->
> > ../../lib/libdl.so.2
> >
> > I renamed it and tried my compile again:
> > > mv libdl.so libdl.so.dpkg-horked
> > ~/tmp $ cc -o cftest cftest.c -ldl
> > /tmp/cceQnY35.o(.text+0x20): In function `main':
> > : warning: Using 'dlopen' in statically linked applications requires at
> > runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking
> > ~/tmp $ ./cftest || echo gar
> > ~/tmp $
> >
> > So it looks as though that worked, although I'm baffled by it, since it
> > was a symlink to the one in /lib. However, gcc still isn't happy about
> > something. Both libc6 and libc6-dev are version 2.3.3ds1-11.
> >
> > Thank you!
>
> Wait, that's not right. The libdl.so -> ../../lib/libdl.so.2 symlink
> is correct. But it should not trigger static linking.
>
> Something else on your system is badly broken to produce this behavior.
I have no problem with this example program cftest.c:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/231024> gcc -o cftest cftest.c
-ldl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/231024>
BTW, moving libdl.so.2 from /usr/lib shows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/231024> sudo mv /usr/lib/libdl.so
/tmp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/231024> gcc -o cftest cftest.c
-ldl
/tmp/cciygHsT.o(.text+0x20): In function `main':
: warning: Using 'dlopen' in statically linked applications requires at
runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/231024> sudo mv /usr/lib/libdl.a
/tmp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/231024> gcc -o cftest cftest.c
-ldl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/231024>
So I think Neale's environment got something broken. Please reinstall
your gcc, glibc, and so on.
Regards,
-- gotom
