At Sun, 9 May 2004 19:39:59 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Second, I for one would consider the absence of overcommitment as a > > bad misfeature. Good luck with the kernel bug report. > > The 2.6 kernel seems to have better memory handling (but I couldn't > try yet). Concerning the 2.4 kernel, the problem seems to be the > documentation.
2.4 is starting the handover process to 2.6 with its role of stable version. So if you want to fix 2.4 kernel documents, please do. I think we reached agreements that this bug is not glibc releated problem. Thanks to Wolfram and Daniel. I would like to close this bug. Vincent, ok? Regards, -- gotom