At Tue, 11 May 2004 15:50:50 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Tue, 11 May 2004 05:47:06 +0200, > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:04:24AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > > >> And that patch wasn't included in the last MU because I wasn't sure how > > >> that would affect the other 10 architectures, and there were already lots > > >> and lots of changes in the MU. > > > > > > Well, that and the fact that it's really a linux-kernel-headers bug, and > > > that's where the fix belongs. > > > > > > lamont > > > > Its still better for util-linux to convert to 64bit file offset bits > > even though with a fixed LKH that would be just wishlist. > > Exactly. When we should confirm to the LSB, that means we should > confirm to the LFS. > > > I've put the patch into linux-kernel-headers cvs. Unfortunatelly > Thiemo's patch is failed to apply for lkh cvs because asm.h is not > existed. I fixed some parts. It'll be out after checking lkh related > bugs.
Could someone try to build the latest lkh and confirm this problem is exactly fixed on mips? The only mips machine vaughan.debian.org does not have "dchroot sid". I tried to test the validity of this patch, but failed. I put the latest cvs image at: http://gotom.jp/~gotom/debian/linux-kernel-headers/ Regards, -- gotom