GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:09:49 +0000,
> Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:49:07AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > The bug still remains but with lvm2 working around it it becomes
>> > wishlist. I still think this should be fixed for sarge so
>> > documentation and implementation are in sync for stable.
>>
>> A similar problem happened before with O_DIRECT and was left
>> unfixed for months.
>>
>> Somebody ought to address the root cause: why aren't the
>> installed header files kept closely in step with the kernels?
>
> Because glibc package is under base freeze for sarge - and many
> packages depend on it under 11 official architectures.
> OTOH, why don't lvm2 package have O_NOATIME definition itself for a
> while?
It has, hence the lowered priority now.
> However I possibly update another release for sarge: 2.3.2.ds1-21
> (which may have O_NOATIME definition, plus some requests).
>
> Regards,
> -- gotom
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
