---------- Initial header ----------- >From : "Randolph Chung" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To : "John David Anglin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC : [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian-hppa@lists.debian.org,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date : Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:53:08 +0800 Subject : Re: Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]
> >>Confirmed. We are passing a function pointer with a value of -2 into > >>__cffc, which should not happen... > > > > > > Is -2 a special signal number? > > I don't think so. in any case, others have observed that if they use an > older glibc, this problem does not happen. > > randolph > Hello all, Which kernel was it? In fact while simply rebuilding a kernel (as root, without fakeroot), I also observe a segfault with 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 (on c110 and d380) but panicing 2.6.12 (on the same c110 and d380) as well as 2.6.13-rc6 on d380 and b2k. Fwiw with kernel 2.6.11.12, the rebuild runs fine on this same d380 and b2k. That's confusing me: is there actualy a pb in libc or do we need some constraint to install this new libc? Thanks, Joel ------------------------------------------------------- NOTE! My email address is changing to ... @scarlet.be Please make the necessary changes in your address book.