"Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sep 9, 2005, at 4:56 PM, Falk Hueffner wrote: > > Actually, I just noticed that sw[1] is probably also > accessed. So you'd add it too. Then it should work. > > Actually, it's not touched between the two assembler instructions.
That's not the point. gcc might for example notice sw[1] is never accessed and shrink the array to size 1. Very unlikely, but why take the chance? -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]