On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:44:45PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:38:54PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > Roland McGrath wrote in > > http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-03/msg00122.html > > I added a couple of things to glibc-2.4, which is now available > > and will be seen on new systems like Fedora Core 5 next week. > > > > It is very likely that users will start complaining soon if we > > are still shipping glibc 2.3.6 in etch. Is there any reason > > not to switch to 2.4? > > No, we should do so. LinuxThreads and some arches are not ready > yet, but I'm sure we can do it in time.
Great. We also have to move the reference manual into non-free. I made some preliminary work on this issue, and it almost runs fine here. Can I put this new glibc-doc-nonfree package into http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-glibc/glibc-doc-nonfree/ ? Or should it go elsewhere? Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
