Hi! On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 02:37:24PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:55:13PM +0100, Ralph Passgang wrote: > > I am sorry to say, but I think the packages doesn't work as expected. I > > have > > installed your libc6, libc6-xen and libc6-dev package on my debian unstable > > system, where xen-3.0.1 is installed but it seems so that nothing has > > changed. I have checked that in dom0 and domU. > > You need some patches from the fedora glibc to support > /etc/ld.so.config.d and mapped hwcaps. After a few time, I found some time to come back on libc6-xen.
It looks like a bit complicated to extract all the patches from the fedora glibc, but it looks like those patches are included in glibc 2.4. That's why I propose to have a libc6-xen with the same path as libc6-i686, and which conflicts with it. When installed it will be activated on i686 class processors, which, if I am right, are the minimum processors supported by Xen. Does it looks ok to you? I have made some test packages, available on: http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/xen Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]