On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 03:03:31AM -0700, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Hi maintainers, > > Sorry, but I'm going to reject this package. > > 1) You're adding a new package directly to unstable, instead of first to > experimental.
Is it a new requirement? I wasn't aware of that. More seriously, I can understand that for libc-bin, but not for package that you are not obliged to install. I plan to add libc6-mipsn32 and libc6-mipsn64 soon. Should they also go thru experimental first? If yes, please either allow two different versions of a package in experimental or please remove glibc 2.4 from it. Also note that experience prooved that almost nobody tests glibc packages from experimental... Or at least they don't report the bugs they found... Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]