On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:28:24PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > severity 387446 normal > thanks > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:05:01PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > I set this to serious because it sort of violates a MUST directive in the > > FHS:
Your changes also violate the FHS, as the system libraries should be in /lib. > This is a known deviation from the FHS on amd64, and not one that is > considered release-critical for etch. There is currently no way to do a plain amd64 distribution without violating the FHS. So I don't really want to make changes that probably have side effects just for violating the FHS another way. My opinion is that the FHS should be changed. Unfortunately nobody seems to read the FHS mailing list... > That probably means that a change for this would not be accepted into etch, > since fiddling library paths may have unexpected side-effects and glibc is > already frozen. > Agreed. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
