On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:38:45PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Looking more closely to the manpage it seems there is actually no bug, > the program behaves as expected: > > "For each zonename on the command line, print the time at the lowest > possible time value, the time one day after the lowest possible time > value, the times both one second before..." > > So that's normal that the output is different on architectures where > time_t has a 64-bit type. > > -9223372036854775808 and 9223372036854775807 are not really > representable in our current gregorian calendar, so those date are > displayed as "NULL".
makes sense. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]