> From: "Xin Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Segment Fault of grep
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
>       (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
>       autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> 
> Package: grep
> Version: 2.5.1.ds2-4
> 
> When the locale is zh_CN.GBK, "grep -i" would produce segment fault
> with binary files. For instance:
> ***
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/tmp$ grep -i readline /bin/bash
> Segmentation fault
> ***
> 
> Best
> Regards,
> 
> LIU Xin
> 

> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:43:11 +0200
> From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug#366469: grep segfaults

> Version: 2.5-1
> 
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:27:31AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > tag 366469 confirmed
> > reassign 366469 grep,libc6
> > retitle 366469 grep -i segfaults matching a binary file in zh_CN.GBK locale
> > thanks
> > 
> > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:42:38PM -0700, Xin Liu wrote:
> > > Package: grep
> > > Version: 2.5.1.ds2-4
> > > 
> > > When the locale is zh_CN.GBK, "grep -i" would produce segment fault
> > > with binary files. For instance:
> > > ***
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/tmp$ grep -i readline /bin/bash
> > > Segmentation fault
> > > ***
> > I can confirm this; thanks for the report.  It looks like it might be
> > a glibc bug:
> > 
> > #0  0xb7eb2c1f in *__GI_memcpy (dstpp=0x8075b48, srcpp=0xbfb7ba24, 
> >     len=4294967295) at ../sysdeps/generic/memcpy.c:55
> > #1  0xb7ee3aab in build_wcs_upper_buffer (pstr=0xbfb7bbc8)
> >     at regex_internal.c:424
> > #2  0xb7ee3ee3 in re_string_reconstruct (pstr=0xbfb7bbc8, idx=163, 
> >     eflags=<value optimized out>) at regex_internal.c:726
> > #3  0xb7eea1cc in re_search_internal (preg=0x8075278, string=0x807e1c5 "", 
> >     length=<value optimized out>, start=134699848, range=349, stop=349, 
> >     nmatch=1, pmatch=0x8075f78, eflags=0) at regexec.c:797
> > #4  0xb7eeb2af in re_search_stub (bufp=0x8075278, string=0x807e1c5 "", 
> >     length=349, start=0, range=349, stop=-1, regs=0x8075298, ret_len=0)
> >     at regexec.c:454
> > #5  0xb7eeb7c3 in __re_search (bufp=0xffffffff, 
> >     string=0x8075b48 "ػ??\204???????????", length=1073738376, start=0, 
> >     range=0, regs=0x0) at regexec.c:318
> > #6  0x08058666 in EGexecute ()
> > #7  0x0804ab02 in grepbuf ()
> > #8  0x0804b4b0 in grepfile ()
> > #9  0x0804d0b4 in main ()

> I am able to reproduce this bug with glibc 2.3.6, but not with glibc
> 2.5, so I guess this bug is fixed.
Xin, can you test that this bug is fixed for you?

Thanks
Justin

Reply via email to