> Quoting your code:
>
>        free(q);
>         if (err = pthread_rwlock_unlock(q->data->rwlock)) {
>
> q is freed, and then use as an argument to pthread_rwlock_unlock().
>

Wow. Sorry, usually I'm not SO stupid. But anyway this was not the problem
I was talking about. Moving "free(q)" down didn't affect anything.
Whats the problem with SCHED_FIFO I wonder?

PS Shit concentrating on thread and locks made me really blind!

Alexey Salmin

Reply via email to