On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 04:08:37PM +0000, Clint Adams wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:12:25AM +0100, Jörgen Grahn wrote: > > I was unaware that SAOL was normative for collation order (it's barely > > normative as a dictionary). I can well imagine them choosing to split > > out 'w' for the purpose of their dictionary, without claiming that > > this is the all-purpose sv_SE collation rule. > > David, thoughts?
True, SAOL isn't normative for collation order. Howver, claiming that SAOL is anything but normative as *the* dictionary for sv_SE is, pardon the expression, pure bullshit. The only other dictionary that has anything close to the same bearing on the Swedish language is SAOB, and that one is purely for historical purposes[1]. Anyway, there seem to be agreement on the tp-sv list that the change in SAOL is indicative of a change in collation order, and I was not the person who started the thread and suggested the change (I just reported it to Debian). The tp-sv list has moved recently though, and I cannot seem to find a list archive for the new list (though I guess/hope you're already subscribed to that list Jörgen, and that you'll voice your dissent there as well?). Regards: David [1] There are several *specialised* dictionaries for narrow fields, such as the word lists published by Tekniska nomenklaturcentralen, etc., but no other full dictionary. -- /) David Weinehall <t...@debian.org> /) Rime on my window (\ // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org