On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:54:20PM +0100, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> reassign 611195 libc6
> tags 611195 + patch
> thanks
>
> > so there you have it in a nutshell. probably the quickest 'fix' is to
> > at least add a check for mprotect's return value
>
> I wrote a patch that should fix the segfault. I couldn't test it because
> I don't have an appropriate environment to rebuild eglibc and test the
> issue.
>
>
> --- elf/dl-load.c 2011-01-26 22:02:02.000000000 +0100
> +++ elf/dl-load.c 2011-01-26 22:30:22.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1398,7 +1398,11 @@
> if (__builtin_expect (p + s <= relro_end, 1))
> {
> /* The variable lies in the region protected by RELRO. */
> - __mprotect ((void *) p, s, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE);
> + if (__mprotect ((void *) p, s, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) < 0)
> + {
> + errstring = N_("cannot change memory protections");
> + goto call_lose_errno;
> + }
> __stack_prot |= PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC;
> __mprotect ((void *) p, s, PROT_READ);
> }
>
>
Given the patch has been refused by upstream glibc, could you please
send it to patc...@eglibc.org with an explanation how what it does, and
stating that it has been refused in glibc?
I am going to apply it in debian, but I don't want to keep it eternally,
so it has to be merged some way.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110226103505.ga11...@volta.aurel32.net
