On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 18:02 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > systemtap-sdt-dev was supposed to be something transparent for the > glibc, but in practice it causes build failure on at least on alpha (see > above). Looking at the BTS, I see it also causes problems with GCC, so I > am a bit concerned on other side effects we might haven't seen yet.
Both issues were GCC bugs now fixed on mainline. See https://gcc.gnu.org/PR61231 and http://gcc.gnu.org/PR61336. The first one was not really related to sys/sdt.h at all. The second was indeed a bug in GCC on alpha triggered by the usage of the "i" constrained in the sys/sdt.h asm, now fixed. > systemtap-sdt-dev was supposed to be arch:all to be able to be used on > all architecture, but in practice it doesn't seems to be the case. Could > you please to switch it back to a specific architecture list where it > actually works? In the meantime we are going to revert SDT support in > eglibc, thus reopening the bug. Better would be to backport the alpha bug fix for GCC. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1402423800.3940.53.ca...@bordewijk.wildebeest.org
