On 2016-07-13 10:18, Craig Small wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:43 PM Aaron M. Ucko <u...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> writes: > > > > > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/local_lim.h:#define HOST_NAME_MAX 64 > > > > I just took a closer look and noticed the "-linux-" in this path. This > > is not a header I would expect kFreeBSD builds to use. > > > > I completely agree it seemed odd that a kfreebsd system included a header > with linux in it.
Could you please tell me which package provides this file on you system? It doesn't seem to come from libc0.1-dev:kfreebsd-amd64. > However it is included at least on my system and there is nothing "linuxy" > about that definition. Perhaps the value is but it seems odd you would put > this into a linux only header. The definition itself is nothing "linuxy", but the value itself is. It seems the correct value would be 256 on a FreeBSD based system instead of 64 on a Linux based system. As I said in my previous email, it's something we can change for at least kFreeBSD. > I have a (yet another kfreebsd kludge) work-around so procps will compile > but it seems to me something to get around the deficiencies or > discrepancies of the libc headers. It's no real biggie to have that in > procps though. Same don't hesitate to list the issues in the kernel headers, that can probably be changed. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
