On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 13:42, Sean Middleditch wrote: > He said Debconf is fine - I'm assuming it's the retarded packages that > don't use Debconf that are the problem. He has a valid point - those > should be expressly denied by Debian policy, Lintian should throw a > hissy-fit at any package that looks like it prompts w/o Debconf, etc.
/me re-reads.
That will teach me to reply to emails before the coffee has kicked in...
;)
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diary: http://advogato.org/person/RossBurton
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
