On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:51, Bastien Nocera wrote: > file-roller2 depends on nautilus1.1 which isn't in unstable. That's why > it's in experimental.
Ah. Well, I've personally been happy with nautilus1.1. Nautilus 1.0 is far too slow for my limited patience... So maybe we could just stick nautilus1.1 in unstable. That's a judgement call on the part of the nautilus1.1 maintainer; what do you think, Takuo? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
