On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 22:47, Joe Drew wrote: > Yeah, but we *are* running unstable. :)
But should it be so unstable that we are just randomly uploading packages? Right now we have no concrete plan. We don't know whether Christian's replacement of the gnome-terminal package with the GNOME 2 version in unstable was deliberate or not. Or at least I don't. And as the maintainer of the GNOME metapackage, I would like to be kept in the loop... Here's an idea: instead of replacing GNOME 1.4 with GNOME 2 in unstable, let's do it in experimental. This will give us a chance to coordinate our uploads. (And again, despite the fact that we call it "unstable", I know many people who run it as their daily working desktop environment. These people are our first line of testers, and are often technically oriented and able to report bugs well. I have a feeling that just dropping GNOME 1.4 without even an attempt at keeping many of their desktop settings will alienate not a few of them...) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
