Le Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:48:33AM +0100, Bastien Nocera �crivait: > They're usually happy after we've solved the problems, yes, but it's > certainly not perfect.
I never said that G2D was perfect. But it is good enough for unstable. > 1) Jeff is an upstream I know that. > > There's no way we're going to complicate our life with twice the > > packages in unstable (asking for a lot of work from the ftpmasters > > BTW). > > And using testing-proposed-updates doesn't complicate our lifes, as well > as the ftp-master's ? What gives work to ftpmasters is adding new packages to the distribution (you know *2 for example...) and removing them a few week later. Uploading existing packages to t-p-u gives no work to ftpmasters. (Actually someone has to move packages from t-p-u to testing, but the plan is to make it automatic as soon as we know how to handle that properly) > > They won't go nuts. > > Maybe. I'm certainly not ready to actually test that in the current > situation. Unfortunately, you're not the only one involved in that decision. It's mainly Christian's decision ... when people will have "file-roller" for G1.4 installed and that G2D is otherwise installed, we'll have *real* problems ... Cheers, -- Rapha�l Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/ Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
