[Sorry, I was losing this mail. Thanks for notification]
>>>>> On 02 Aug 2002 12:59:20 -0400,
>>>>> "CW" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CW> I think the solution to this problem is simply to make metacity have a
CW> higher alternatives priority than twm (and most other window managers).
CW> If the system administrator installs metacity, they likely did it as
CW> part of installing GNOME 2, and that means they likely want GNOME 2 to
CW> be the default desktop.
CW> Besides, metacity's functionality is basically a useful superset of that
CW> of twm.
CW> Akira? What do you think?
For G2D, it's good idea, I think. for just WM, looks like
metacity has some bugs. I'm not sure how many people are
using metacity without G2D, though.
Anyway I agreed this, it's my opinion.
Regards,
--
Akira TAGOH : [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Japan GNOME Users Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED] / GNOME-DB Project
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Red Hat, Inc.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Debian Project
