Chipzz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> But why not release a version of gnome-vfs which doesn't depend on fam,
> allow it to exist long enough to migrate to testing, and immediately af-
> ter that replace it with a gnome-vfs which does require fam again?
> You could put a debconf notice in the pre-install of the package, ex-
> plaining that unstable users should put gnome-vfs on hold, and allowing
> the user to quit at that point.
[...]
That won't be necessary. Look at the latest changelog.Debian.gz entry
for fam:
fam (2.6.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
* After a long period of testing, I am finally sure that libfam0c102
definitely can provide libfam0 without introducing problems. libfam
is apparently completely "extern C".
(closes: Bug#176849, Bug#177970, Bug#181100, Bug#181104)
[...]
-- Joerg Wendland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 15 May 2003 08:30:06
+0200
If I'm not mistaken, this means that the latest fam should enter
testing within some days.
Johannes
