Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> manually overrides these conflicts? Rubrica is pretty much alpha >> quality software. Temporary removing it from testing should be an >> acceptable choice! > > I disagree with the alpha part,
I've tested it quite briefly. If my judgement is unjustified, I apologize. > but rubrica testing removal has been > asked 3 days ago to avoid this blockage. Alas, the removal has yet to happen. :-((( >> For libxslt1-python2.2 I read: >> >> libxslt1-python2.2 is confusing ( in unstable, 1.0.30-3 in testing) > > I don't know for thus part .. That's a package on which the old rubrica package in testing depends on. Unstable has libxslt1-python2.3 instead. So it all comes down to rubrica. Ciao, Johannes -- ~/.signature under construction
