On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 01:58:53PM +0200, J�r�me Warnier wrote: > Le dim 29/08/2004 � 03:24, Amaya a �crit : > > J�r�me Warnier wrote: > > > Anyway, maybe your package is better? > > > > The package name is more descriptive, at least ;) > The package name doesn't have to be descriptive, it must be the name of > the program, nothing more. > The name advertised on the web page was until now COG (COnfigurator for > GNOME), which is more descriptive of what the package really does. > "gnome-configurator" describes a configurator (for what?) written to use > the GNOME libraries to me. > > Uptsream's tar.gz is still named "cog" also.
Well, there is also a problem of namespace pollution. gnome-configurator is cleaner then, and cog may be another program to design cogs, or a game handling boats, or whatever. Friendly, Sven Luther
