Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>  I don't care how slow gnucash development is.  If 10000 packages made
>  the switch from GNOME 1 to GNOME 2 _except_ gnucash, then to the hell
>  with it.  You're saying I'm insensible with the gnucash developers and
>  their pace of development, why don't you simply say I'm the one putting
>  the knife under gnucash's throat and I can decide life or death of a
>  project?

What about users who *depend* on gnucash for their work? I'm,
accidently, one of them. I use gnucash for the accounting in my work
and I can't see any alternative to it, no matter how obsolete GNOME 1
is.

Thanks,

Johannes


-- 
http://www.infoe.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to