On Wed, Oct 04, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Problems with using the UI of 2.12: upstream changed the UI for 2.14 > > and kept the changes for 2.16, we would be diverging. > > > > In general, I would prefer it if we could fix the UI upstream so that > > we get the translations for free, but of course this is a solution for > > long term only. > Sure, the plan is to push this change upstream.
Hmm, I wonder what new arguments we have to *revert* this old decision which they kept between 2.14 and 2.16. > > My preference goes to keeping the 2.14 dialog, but we could perhaps > > make this dependent of a GConf key to toggle between 2.12's and 2.14's > > version; at least if we don't get consensus in the user base, there > > will be a solution for end-users to choose what they prefer. > Having to fiddle with gconf for a feature as simple as session saving > seems too much a hassle. Do you have another idea to conceal the fact I want to stick to upstream and you want the 2.12 version? The idea of making it a GConf value is that a one-liner can help switching from one to the other and be documented in the README.Debian files. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
