On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 10:34:51PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 23:41:00 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > A few weeks ago I asked on #-release about the possibility of updating all > > evolution components to their 3.4.4 releases. > > > > It's very rare that GNOME releases .4 tarballs for their cycles, but it > > seems the evolution maintainer saw it fit, as there were quite a few > > important bugfixes accumulating in the 3-4 branch. > > > The evo-ews diff is on the "bigger than I'd like" side, so I set that > one to age 15 days. eds and gtkhtml4.0 unblocked. The rest will have > to wait for another day. Also, why did eds shlibs get bumped, I don't > see a justification for that in the diff.
I hadn't noticed, but it seems we're calling dh_makeshlibs -V. This might make sense at some other times as eds changes are normally big between microreleases, but in the case of .4 the changes were a lot smaller than the average. This should be a non-issue from now on, as eds has gained some shiny symbols files. -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ jo...@sindominio.net jo...@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121105154515.ga4...@aigua.oskuro.net
