Hi John. Em Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:57:42 -0500 John Goerzen <jgoer...@complete.org> escreveu: (...) > Personally I am unconvinced of the merits of a monolithic (whether > literally or logically) repo, when a simple shell script with "for" > could suffice.
I think a big repo is good for making the same changes in a lot of packages. If the packages look the same, or almost the same, most of the changes we do to one of the packages will be neeeded to do to the another. Then, we would end up with the same packages, with the same body and description in a lot of different repos. It'd be easier to forget a package this way. (...) > If the group prefers Darcs, that's fine; I'll use > it, but I'm not going to volunteer to set up infrastructure for it > because I don't have time to do that. What's the infrastructure? I can do this too. I already have a space in code.haskell.org that I use for my packages, and I can create a darcs repository with all the debian/ parts of the haskell packages around. I'll mail here when it's done. Good afternoon. -- marcot http://marcot.iaaeee.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
