Jeremy Shaw wrote: > If that is true, then I would be happy with leaving the current HaXml > upload alone and creating libghc6-haxml13-dev and having packages > depend on that if they want the old API.
I also prefer this option but that would require all apps that currently have Build-Depends on libghc6-haxml-dev to chaneg that to the haxml13 version. > Downside: > - requires significantly more work now. (Though, we make up for it > in the long run?) >From where we are now, adding the epoch vs hasml13 is about the same amount of work. I think the biggest difficulty we're going to have is finding consensus on which fix we choose :-). Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
