Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 10.08.2011, 21:05 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > This seems to be the ghci segfault problem. I tried to build > it manually by compiling Setup.lhs, configuring and building > and I get the same problem: > > > erikd@corea > ./Setup build > Preprocessing library data-accessor-template-0.2.1.7... > Building data-accessor-template-0.2.1.7... > [1 of 2] Compiling Data.Accessor.Template ( src-5/Data/Accessor/ > Template.hs, dist/build/Data/Accessor/Template.o ) > [2 of 2] Compiling Data.Accessor.Template.Example ( src/Data/ > Accessor/Template/Example.hs, dist/build/Data/Accessor/Template/Example.o ) > Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done. > Loading package integer-gmp ... linking ... done. > Loading package base ... linking ... done. > Loading package utility-ht-0.0.5.1 ... linking ... done. > Loading package array-0.3.0.2 ... linking ... done. > Loading package containers-0.4.0.0 ... linking ... done. > Loading package pretty-1.0.1.2 ... linking ... done. > Loading package template-haskell ... linking ... done. > Loading package transformers-0.2.2.0 ... linking ... done. > Loading package data-accessor-0.2.1.7 ... linking ... done. > erikd@corea > echo $? > 11 > > Exit code of 11 is segfault. Looks like this is a package > that we can't build on powerpc until ghc is fixed.
Is this http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631073 ? Was there something we can do about this (e.g. different build settings), or do we have to wait for a fixed upstream version? Should we stop building ghci on powerpc? And can we maybe add a check to the build so that it fails if ghci does not work (e.g. with "ghc -e 'return()'")? Does "ghc -e 'return()'" work on powerpc? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
