On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 09:51:16AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 02.04.2014, 23:44 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson: > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 02:49:51PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, den 01.04.2014, 13:16 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson: > > > > I've attached the arm64-specific parts of the current patch I'm working > > > > with, most of which are due to Karel Gardas. Assuming that I actually > > > > manage to build 7.6 (which is by no means a given), would it be > > > > acceptable to apply something like this patch set to the Debian > > > > packaging? > > > > > > Sure! Just let us know when you actually want it to be included. > > > > Right, thanks. Continuing the saga here: > > > > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2014-April/113408.html > > I think that on glasgow-haskell-users you are more likely to reach the > right audience.
I reposted there, but then got past it by myself (eventually), so I cancelled my post. > > I'm running a build test on harris; if that works then I'll send it > > upstream and push it to darcs. > > Thanks. This is looking good, although harris only has one CPU so it isn't quite done yet. I notice as a result that our darcs GHC repository is at 7.8, though, and my understanding of darcs is that a 7.6 maintenance branch (e.g. for arm64 porting) would need to be pushed to a different directory, maybe just s/ghc/ghc-7.6/. Do you have any preferences? -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
