Hello, I try to test the current package plan on bookworm but I end up with this error
Creating fake global package db Testing packages in 1 different groups Running cabal-install (group default)... Cabal install failed: Warning: the --global flag is deprecated -- it is generally considered a bad idea to install packages into the global store cabal: Could not resolve dependencies: [__0] next goal: Agda (user goal) [__0] rejecting: Agda-2.6.4.3, Agda-2.6.4.1, Agda-2.6.4 (constraint from command line flag requires ==2.6.3) [__0] trying: Agda-2.6.3 [__1] trying: base-4.15.1.0/installed-4.15.1.0 (dependency of Agda) [__2] next goal: dbus (user goal) [__2] rejecting: dbus-1.3.6, dbus-1.3.5, dbus-1.3.4, dbus-1.3.3, dbus-1.3.2, dbus-1.3.1, dbus-1.3.0 (constraint from command line flag requires ==1.2.29) [__2] rejecting: dbus-1.2.29 (conflict: base==4.15.1.0/installed-4.15.1.0, dbus => base>=4.16 && <5) [__2] skipping: dbus-1.2.28, dbus-1.2.27, dbus-1.2.26, dbus-1.2.25, dbus-1.2.24 (has the same characteristics that caused the previous version to fail: excludes 'base' version 4.15.1.0) [__2] rejecting: dbus-1.2.23, dbus-1.2.22, dbus-1.2.21, dbus-1.2.19, dbus-1.2.18, dbus-1.2.17, dbus-1.2.16, dbus-1.2.15.1, dbus-1.2.14, dbus-1.2.13, dbus-1.2.12, dbus-1.2.11, dbus-1.2.10, dbus-1.2.9, dbus-1.2.8, dbus-1.2.7, dbus-1.2.6, dbus-1.2.5, dbus-1.2.4, dbus-1.2.3, dbus-1.2.2, dbus-1.2.1, dbus-1.1.1, dbus-1.1.0, dbus-1.0.1, dbus-1.0.0, dbus-0.10.15, dbus-0.10.14, dbus-0.10.13, dbus-0.10.12, dbus-0.10.11, dbus-0.10.10, dbus-0.10.9.2, dbus-0.10.9.1, dbus-0.10.9, dbus-0.10.8, dbus-0.10.7, dbus-0.10.6, dbus-0.10.5, dbus-0.10.4, dbus-0.10.3, dbus-0.10.2, dbus-0.10.1, dbus-0.10 (constraint from command line flag requires ==1.2.29) [__2] fail (backjumping, conflict set: base, dbus) After searching the rest of the dependency tree exhaustively, these were the goals I've had most trouble fulfilling: base, dbus, Agda Use of uninitialized value $_[0] in join or string at /usr/share/perl5/File/Slurp.pm line 321. 29 error(s) in total. The salsa-CI seems to be happy with the current package plan. https://salsa.debian.org/haskell-team/package-plan/-/pipelines/699313 So my question is it mendatory to prepare package only on unstable . thanks Fred
