Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:39:58AM -0700, Clifford Beshers wrote:
If dates are okay, then you could use either 2006.10.12 or 20061012. If
you want to reserve the possibility of switching over to the 1.0, 2.0,
... style, we could pick 0.0.20061012.
It's also possible to use the new ~ separator [1]:
Or, more formally, the sort algorithm used by dpkg/APT/dak/whatever
sorts ~ before the zero-length string. Thus:
So another option would be something like 0~20061012.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/08/msg00006.html
I've always thought of that as a last resort, when the versioning gets
messed up. Is that not the case?
In any case, Neil is looking into getting an upstream version number on
his system.
|
_______________________________________________
debian-haskell mailing list
[email protected]
http://urchin.earth.li/mailman/listinfo/debian-haskell
