Kari Pahula wrote: > I wasn't quite happy with either haskell-utils' or haskell-devscripts' > style of Haskell library packaging. > > In my eyes, haskell-utils was just too messy with all those generated > files and haskell-devscripts was too monolithic, with a magic > dh_haskell call that did all the work. It was a step in the right > direction, but I felt that it replicated much of what was done in CDBS > and rightly belonged to its domain. > > Therefore, I chose to reimplement (most of) the wheel. I discarded > most of haskell-devscripts and just used dh_haskell_prep and made a > CDBS rule file to take care of the rest. > > Here's my complete debian/rules file, using CDBS: > #!/usr/bin/make -f > include $(CURDIR)/debian/hlibrary.mk > > Neat, no? And this should work for any cabalized Haskell library. > That's the theory, at least. The rest is mostly controlled by > debian/control. This has been successfully tested with haskell-binary > (already in unstable) and haskell-hlist. > > I know some people wouldn't touch CDBS if they can help it...
What's the relation of this and the hbuild.mk file that's in CDBS already? I can't seem to get hbuild.mk to work at all, not even after dealing with bug #412388[1]. /M [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=412388 -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus．therning＠gmail．com http://therning.org/magnus What if I don't want to obey the laws? Do they throw me in jail with the other bad monads? -- Daveman
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ debian-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://urchin.earth.li/mailman/listinfo/debian-haskell
