[Moving to the list, as it might be of interest to others] Hi,
Am Montag, den 30.06.2008, 16:46 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > Em Seg, 2008-06-30 às 11:20 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu: > > I think this is to make sure that the autobuilders will only build the > > package when they have an up-to-date ghc already, otherwise the > > generated package will be uninstallable once the ghc6 is up-to-date. > > > > It might even be advisable to use strict dependencies for the various > > used haskell-libs. This is what haskell-utils is doing. > > Then I think I should study a little bit more of haskell-utils to try to > adapt it's new version to gtk2hs. Sounds good. Until gtk2hs is cabalized you probably can’t use haskell-utils directly, but if you agree with it’s way of handling dependencies, you can adopt that of course. > I've asked about moving it to cdbs, do you think it's a good idea? Personally, I see cdbs as the right tool for packages that build and install in a very standard way, i.e., if no or very little modification to the building has to be done, and I doubt that this applies to gtk2hs. OTOH, since you are stepping up as the maintainer of gtk2hs, if you prefer cdbs, you are welcome to use it, of course. > Maybe it'd be good to wait till I improve the deps --- or at least, keep > the ghc6 dep the way it were. You didn’t upload a package with an unversioned dependency on ghc6 yet, right? So I can upload that if you want, but if you prefer to work on the packaging yet some more, that’s fine with me. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ debian-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://urchin.earth.li/mailman/listinfo/debian-haskell
