Le dimanche, 8 jun 2003, � 20:36 Europe/Paris, Daniel Jacobowitz a �crit :


On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 06:19:20PM +0300, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
-------------------
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 03:02:32PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 22:56:05 -0600
Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:50:54PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz
wrote:
After this release, the next time they don't build, I will
drop them
and ask ftpmaster for GDB to be removed from the HPPA port
unless I've
seen some effort to get the hppa-linux port integrated
upstream.


What GDB version are you working against? The one in sid, or the
one
in upstream CVS? They've changed a lot.


We're working on the one in sid, with the aim of getting the hppa diff
between upstream and that one integrated upstream, as we were asked
for.

Well, I've made about a thousand lines of changes to the one in sid that I'll be uploading shortly, in order to integrate it with the GDB CVS repository. So you will probably want to pick up the changes from pa-tdep.c and pa-linux-tdep.c between the version currently in sid and the new one. It's all mechanical; it needs some non-mechanical updating, but I don't have a local HPPA system to test it on.

OK, that's good to know.

In general, if you're working on a package it's good to coordinate with either the package maintainer or the upstream authors...

Sure, that's why we contacted either, we sent you a mail on april 29th,
and as Grant said, we asked on IRC, where Carlos O'Donnel and Randolph Chung
were present. Carlos seemed to speak authoritatively concerning Alan's work.


Anyway, we're not working on a package "per se", we're working on getting
changes merged upstream and fixing known bugs.



Thibaut VARENE The PA/Linux ESIEE Team http://pateam.esiee.fr/




Reply via email to