[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:22:52PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> While you are right that it probably needs a ',', I don't think that's >> our problem. >> >> The last successfull build of the glibc on hppa was two weeks ago, with >> version 2.5-9. The exact same version does not build anymore now. >> > > I've checked the buildd logs. > > Here is the diff from environnement : > Package | buildd vers | current vers > ----------------------------------------------- > make | 3.81.3 | 3.81.3 > gawk | 3.1.5.dfsg-4 | 3.1.5.dfsg-4 > intltool-debian | 0.35.0+20060710.1 | 0.35.0+20060710.1 > gettext-base | 0.16.1-1 | 0.16.1-1 > gettext | 0.16.1-1 | 0.16.1-1 > autoconf | 2.61-4 | 2.61-4 > html2text | 1.3.2a-3+b1 | 1.3.2a-3+b1 > po-debconf | 1.0.8 | 1.0.8 > bzip2 | 1.0.3-7 | 1.0.3-7 > lzma | 4.43-7 | 4.43-7 > diffstat | 1.43-2 | 1.43-2 > m4 | 1.4.9-1 | 1.4.9-1 > quilt | 0.46-2 | 0.46-2 > ---------------------------------------------- > dpkg-dev | 1.14.3 | 1.14.4 > sed | 4.1.5-1 | 4.1.5-2 > binutils | 2.17cvs20070428-6 | 2.17cvs20070426-8 > gcc-4.1 | 4.1.2-7 | 4.1.2-11 > g++-4.1 | 4.1.2-7 | 4.1.2-12 > libstdc++6-4.1-dev | 4.1.2-7 | 4.1.2-12 > libstdc++6 | 4.1.2-7 | 4.1.2-12 > libmagic1 | 4.20-8 | 4.21-1 > file | 4.20-8 | 4.21-1 > debhelper | 5.0.49 | 5.0.50 > linux-libc-dev | 3.6.21-2 | 2.6.21-4 > libc6-dev | 2.5-7 | 2.5-9 > ---------------------------------------------- > > I'll try to downgrade the packages. > The most suspects are the binutils and linux-libc-dev. > I can't get a hand on a -6 version of binutils. > Do you know where the .dsc and diffs are archived ?
You can get it from http://snapshot.debian.net , and even the .deb file. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
