On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 05:03:59PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > > Yet that doesn't change anything to the fact that the port is nowadays > clearly lacking manpower. The very few people actually doing work on the > port have unfortunately less and less time on their hands (I for one can > just keep up with my own chores, not much more), and we have no "fresh > blood" coming in to contribute. *That* is a problem...
My idea of the problem is that PA-RISC is a dead architecture. Why "fresh blood" should invest on a dead horse? I would be glad to help but I need to invest more and more time for what? Maybe the glory to have helped PA-RISC live another couple of years and maybe a release cycle? Really? cheers, Domenico -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
