Le 6 août 2010 à 03:46, dann frazier a écrit : > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 03:30:41AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: >> Dear HPPA porters, dear HPPA port users, >> >> the Release Team is currently wondering if it makes sense to release with >> HPPA as a regular stable architecture with squeeze. It might be that >> it is not up to the standards of a regular Debian release. We seem to >> chase random segmentation faults, causing multiple give-backs to eventually >> yield a built package. > > I realize this doesn't address the larger concerns you mention, but.. > > I've found that a workstation I recently acquired (a c3700) seems > to reliably build packages that reliably fail on our existing > buildds (subversion, for one). I assume CPU architecture differences > allow this box to be immune to the issues causing these builds to > fail.
Out of curiosity, are you running a 32 or 64bit kernel? It seems weird to me though that C3700 would work and not J6700, since ISTR their respective hardware don't differ that much... > Due to the formfactor, I don't think HP would be able to host it and > my upstream bandwidth at home is too limited. If the project wanted to > make this machine a buildd and find hosting for it, I'd be willing to > maintain the buildd. IIRC C3700 is B2000-style box. It can be racked sideways with L-shapped support rails. My previous hosting offer still stands, although I believe it might not be the easiest/closest one for you ;-) HTH -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e3419b17-e155-4e9d-a8be-90658ff04...@debian.org
