On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:24:28PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:12 AM, dann frazier <da...@dannf.org> wrote: > > Right - we have machines we should be able to use (peri/penalosa) - > > they currently only build lenny updates today. And yeah, not having a > > stable release will make managing these systems a bigger timesink, and > > I won't be able to volunteer for that. > > > > DSA manages these machines for us, and it probably isn't feasible to > > give non-DDs access to boxes building security updates. So, we'll > > likely need to repurpose one of these machines and manage it under > > debian-ports. That leaves us w/o a backup for lenny updates, but I can > > setup a system here at home in a pinch. Once lenny support ends, both > > machines could be allocated for debian-ports. > > [trimming CC list] > > Dan, > > So it looks like we have one machine that we could setup as a > unstable/experimental buildd? > > How do we get started on that and how can I help?
DSA seems ok with us repurposing penalosa for this. I suspect we'll want to reinstall it, which I can help with (I have remote console/power access). Once installed, I can setup accounts for the admin(s) to complete the configuration. If we want to move to the debian-ports domain, I can work with HP to update DNS. I'm not sure what the d-p buildd configuration entails - you should probably work with the debian-ports folks to identify recommended versions of sbuild, if there's any central LDAP service for managing users, autosigning options, etc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110707160740.ga12...@dannf.org