On 19-Apr-14, at 2:59 PM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
So if 64-bit binutils are required, then surely the binutils package
should build them.
It does. They are provided in the binutils-hppa64 package.
Thanks for the clarification. Not a bug in the gcc package, but a
bug in
the binutils package then. Failure to provide hppa64-linux-gnu-ld
causes
the gcc stage1 to fail during configure (due to setting
with_hppa64=yes).
I think what has happened is someone has removed/unregistered binutils-
hppa64.
On the Debian package website, it's listed as "debports" and it's no
longer listed as
being built from the binutils source. On leda, it's shown as not
registered:
dave@leda:~$ wanna-build -A hppa -d unstable -i binutils-
hppa64binutils-hppa64: not registered
See:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/binutils-hppa64
Yet, it is still listed here:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/binutils.html
Matthias, how do we fix this?
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/blu0-smtp434672e17f342a140eb43b97...@phx.gbl
